PUMA SE, ET AL
v.
SHARA PROCTOR, ET AL
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The trial court's nonfinal order is affirmed.
PUMA SE and related entities appealed a nonfinal order from the Circuit Court for Broward County in a case involving athlete Shara Proctor.…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
FOURTH DISTRICT
PUMA SE, PUMA INTERNATIONAL SPORTS MARKETING
B.V., and PUMA NORTH AMERICA, INC., Appellant,
V.
SHARA PROCTOR, Appellee.
No. 4D2025-3614
[June 25, 2026]
Appeal of a nonfinal order from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Michele Towbin Singer, Judge; L.T. Case No. 062024CA008574AXXXCE.
Julia M. Wischmeier, Zachary Scott Foster, and Melanie Collette Kalmanson of Quarles & Brady LLP, Tampa, for appellant.
Elizabeth M. Vélez of Lewis Baach Kaufmann Middlemiss, PLLC, New York, New York, and Jason Michael Azzarone of La Cava, Jacobson & Goodis, P.A., Tampa, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed.
LEVINE, FORST and SHEPHERD, JJ., concur.
* * *