IN RE: AMENDMENTS TO FLORIDA RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE

Fla. | 2026-06-25
No. SC2025-0241
Muñiz, C.J., Labarga, J., Couriel, J., Grosshans, J., Francis, J., Sasso, J., Tanenbaum, J.
2026 FL 7903 Florida Supreme Court (2026)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The Florida Supreme Court adopted amendments to Rules 9.210, 9.310, 9.800, and 9.900 of the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure, effective September 1, 2026, while withdrawing the proposed amendment to Rule 9.100.


Headnotes

[1] An initial brief in an appellate proceeding must include a jurisdictional statement specifying the basis for claiming that the judgment or order appealed from is final or…

[2] A party seeking an automatic stay of a money judgment pending review must post a bond equal to the principal amount of the judgment plus twice the statutory rate of inter…

Previewing 2 of 5 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Key Quotes

“The Committee filed a response to the comment, withdrawing its proposal to amend rule 9.100 in light of the comment filed but requesting the Court to adopt the remaining amendments as proposed.”

Establishes that the Committee withdrew one proposal based on public feedback while seeking adoption of the others.

Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Facts & Procedural History

The Florida Bar's Appellate Court Rules Committee filed a report proposing amendments to five rules of appellate procedure. The Board of Governors una…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Combined

PER CURIAM.

The Florida Bar’s Appellate Court Rules Committee filed a

report proposing amendments to Florida Rules of Appellate

Procedure 9.100 (Original Proceedings), 9.210 (Briefs), 9.310 (Stay

Pending Review), 9.800 (Uniform Citation System), and 9.900

(Forms).1

The Board of Governors of The Florida Bar unanimously

recommends acceptance of the proposed amendments. The Court

published the proposed amendments for comment, and one

comment was received regarding the proposed amendments to rule

1. We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 2(a), Fla. Const.; see also Fla. R. Gen. Prac. & Jud. Admin. 2.140(b)(1). 9.100. The Committee filed a response to the comment,

withdrawing its proposal to amend rule 9.100 in light of the

comment filed but requesting the Court to adopt the remaining

amendments as proposed.

We accept the withdrawal of the Committee’s proposal for rule

9.100 and decline to amend rule 9.100 at this time. We adopt the

other amendments as proposed by the Committee with additional

amendments to rule 9.210 and a minor modification to the

proposed amendment to rule 9.900. We discuss the more

significant amendments below.

First, in rule 9.210, we add a new subdivision (b)(3) to require

inclusion of a jurisdictional statement in the initial brief. The

subsequent subdivisions are renumbered accordingly. Renumbered

subdivision (b)(6) is amended to specify that the initial brief must

include “for each issue presented, argument with citation to

appropriate authorities, a citation to the record on appeal where the

issue was preserved, and a statement of the applicable appellate

standard of review.” Also, we rephrase renumbered subdivision

(b)(9) to clarify that a certificate of compliance is only required for

computer-generated briefs.

Next, we amend rule 9.310 by adding “Automatic Stay” to the

title of subdivision (b) so that it reads “Exceptions; Automatic Stay.”

Next, in subdivision (b), we delete the word “principal” to make it

clear that the bond must be equal to the amount of the judgment

plus twice the statutory rate of interest. We further replace “on

judgments on the total amount on which the party has an

obligation to pay interest” with “in effect on the date the judgment is

filed” to clarify whether postjudgment interest can be awarded on

the portion of the judgment that was prejudgment interest.

We also amend the case citations in rule 9.800 to reflect the

change from two-digit year and varied number of digits for case

number designators to the four-digit year and four-digit case

number designators.

Last, the Committee proposes amending subdivisions (c)(1)

and (c)(2) of rule 9.900 by updating the forms to ask that the filer

indicate under which rule of appellate procedure the notice of

appeal of a nonfinal order is being filed. However, we modify this

language to ask the filer to cite to the specific subdivision of the rule

that the review is based on. We then amend the forms in

subdivisions (c)(1) and (c)(2) to clarify that the date requested is the

date of the order being appealed.

Accordingly, the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure are

amended as set forth in the appendix to this opinion. New language

is indicated by underscoring; deletions are indicated by struck-

through type. The amendments become effective September 1,

2026, at 12:01 a.m.

It is so ordered.

MUÑIZ, C.J., and LABARGA, COURIEL, GROSSHANS, FRANCIS, SASSO, and TANENBAUM, JJ., concur.

THE FILING OF A MOTION FOR REHEARING SHALL NOT ALTER

THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THESE AMENDMENTS.

Original Proceeding – Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure

Dwayne Antonio Robinson, Chair, Appellate Court Rules Committee, Miami, Florida, Christine Riley Davis, Past Chair, Appellate Court Rules Committee, St. Petersburg, Florida, Joshua E. Doyle, Executive Director, The Florida Bar, Tallahassee, Florida, and Heather Savage Telfer, Staff Liaison, The Florida Bar, Tallahassee, Florida,

for Petitioner

Elaine D. Walter of Kula & Associates, P.A., Miami, Florida,

Responding with comments

APPENDIX

RULE 9.210. BRIEFS

(a) [No Change]

(b) Contents of Initial Brief. The initial brief must contain the following, in order:

(1) –(2) [No Change]

(3) a jurisdictional statement including:

(A) the basis for claiming that the judgment or order appealed from is final; or

(B) if nonfinal, the basis for claiming that the judgment or order appealed from is otherwise appealable, including the procedural rule and/or statutory provision upon which jurisdiction rests along with a concise statement of the relevant facts establishing jurisdiction;

(34) a statement of the case and of the facts, which must include the nature of the case, the course of the proceedings, and the disposition in the lower tribunal, with references to the appropriate pages of the record or transcript;

(45) a summary of argument, suitably paragraphed, condensing succinctly, accurately, and clearly the argument actually made in the body of the brief, which should not be a mere repetition of the headings under which the argument is arranged;

(56) argument with regard to each issuefor each issue presented, argument with citation to appropriate authorities, and includinga citation to the record on appeal where the issue was preserved, and a statement of the applicable appellate standard of review;

(67) a short conclusion setting forth the precise relief sought;

(78) a certificate of service; and

(89) for computer-generated briefs, a certificate of compliance for computer-generated briefs.

(c)-(h) [No Change]

Committee Notes [No Change] Court Commentary [No Change]

RULE 9.310. STAY PENDING REVIEW

(a) [No Change]

(b) Exceptions; Automatic Stay.

(1) Money Judgments. If the order is a judgment solely for the payment of money, a party may obtain an automatic stay of execution pending review, without the necessity of a motion or order, by posting a good and sufficient bond equal to the principal amount of the judgment plus twice the statutory rate of interest on judgments on the total amount on which the party has an obligation to pay interestin effect on the date the judgment is filed. Multiple parties having common liability may file a single bond satisfying the above criteria.

(2) [No Change]

(c) Bond.

(1) Defined. A good and sufficient bond is a bond with a principal and a surety company authorized to do business in the State of Florida, or cash deposited in the clerk of the lower

tribunal’s office. The lower tribunal will have continuing jurisdiction to determine the actual sufficiency of any such bond.

(2) Conditions. The conditions of a bond must include a condition to pay or comply with the order in full, including costs;, interest;, fees;, and damages for delay, use, detention, and depreciation of property, if the review is dismissed or order affirmed; and may include such other conditions as may be required by the lower tribunal.

(d) Judgment Against a Surety. A surety on a bond conditioning a stay submits to the jurisdiction of the lower tribunal and the court. The liability of the surety on suchthe bond may be enforced by the lower tribunal or the court, after motion and notice, without the necessity of an independent action.

(e)–(f) [No Change]

Committee Notes [No Change]

RULE 9.800. UNIFORM CITATION SYSTEM

This rule applies to all legal documents, including court opinions. Except for citations to case reporters, all citation forms should be spelled out in full if used as an integral part of a sentence either in the text or in footnotes. Abbreviated forms as shown in this rule should be used if the citation is intended to stand alone either in the text or in footnotes.

(a) Florida Supreme Court.

(1)–(2) [No Change]

(3) For cases not published in Southern Reporter, cite to Florida Law Weekly: Traylor v. State, 17 Fla. L. Weekly S42 (Fla. Jan. 16, 1992). If not therein, cite to the slip opinion: Medina v. State, No. SC2000-0280 (Fla. Mar. 14, 2002). With a slip opinion cite, citations to Westlaw: Singh v. State, No. SC2010-1544, 2014 WL 7463592 (Fla. Dec. 30, 2014), or LEXIS: Johnston v. State, No.

SC2009-0839, 2010 Fla. LEXIS 62 (Fla. Jan. 21, 2010), may also be provided.

(b) Florida District Courts of Appeal.

(1) [No Change]

(2) For cases not published in Southern Reporter, cite to Florida Law Weekly: Myers v. State, 16 Fla. L. Weekly D1507 (Fla. 4th DCA June 5, 1991). If not therein, cite to the slip opinion: Fleming v. State, No. 1D2001-2734 (Fla. 1st DCA Mar. 6, 2002). With a slip opinion cite, citations to Westlaw: Williams v. State, No. 2D2014-2438, 2014 WL 3418358 (Fla. 2d DCA June 12, 2014), or LEXIS: Minakan v. Husted, No. 4D2009-4439, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 288 (Fla. 4th DCA Jan. 20, 2010), may also be provided.

(c) Florida Circuit Courts and County Courts.

(1) Circuit Court: State v. Ruoff, 17 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 619 (Fla. 17th Cir. Ct. Feb. 13, 2010).

(2)–(3) [No Change]

(d)–(q) [No Change]

Committee Notes [No Change]

RULE 9.900. FORMS

(a)–(b) [No Change]

(c) Notice of Appeal of Nonfinal Order.

(1) Notice of Appeal of Nonfinal Order.

IN THE .....(NAME OF THE

LOWER TRIBUNAL WHOSE

ORDER IS TO BE

REVIEWED).....

Case No.

,) Defendant/Appellant, ) ) v. ) NOTICE OF APPEAL OF A ) NONFINAL ORDER ,) Plaintiff/Appellee. ) ) )

NOTICE IS GIVEN that , Defendant/Appellant, appeals to the .....(name of court that has appellate jurisdiction)....., the order of this court rendered [see rule 9.020(h)] .....(date of order)...... [Conformed copies of orders designated in the notice of appeal must be attached in accordance with rules 9.110(d), 9.130(c), and 9.160(c).]

The nature of the order is a nonfinal order .....(state nature of the order)...... under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure .....(state specific rule number and subdivision)......

[Any orders designated in the notice of appeal must be attached in accordance with rules 9.110(d), 9.130(c), and 9.160(c).]

Attorney for .....(name of party)..... .....(address, e-mail address, and phone number)..... Florida Bar No. ....................

(2) Notice of Cross-Appeal of Nonfinal Order.

IN THE .....(NAME OF THE

LOWER TRIBUNAL WHOSE

ORDER IS TO BE

REVIEWED).....

Case No.

,) Defendant/Appellant/) Cross-Appellee, ) ) v. ) NOTICE OF CROSS-APPEAL ) OF A NONFINAL ORDER ,) Plaintiff/Appellee/ ) Cross-Appellant. ) )

NOTICE IS GIVEN that , Plaintiff/Cross- Appellant, appeals to the .....(name of court that has appellate jurisdiction)....., the order of this court rendered [see rule 9.020(h)] .....(date of order)......

The nature of the order is a nonfinal order .....(state nature of the order)...... under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure .....(state specific rule number and subdivision)......

Attorney for .....(name of party).....

.....(address, e-mail address, and phone number)..... Florida Bar No. ....................

(d)–(n) [No Change]

Committee Notes [No Change]


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw