JASON WELLS
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA

Fla. 5th DCA | 2026-06-26
No. 2025-1897
Hatcher, J., Wallis, J., Harris, J., Soud, J.
2026 FL 7969 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (2026)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

A trial court's dismissal of a Rule 3.850 post-conviction motion without prejudice and allowing time to file an amended motion is a non-final, non-appealable order.


Headnotes

[1] A trial court's dismissal of a Rule 3.850 post-conviction motion without prejudice and permitting amendment within a specified period is a non-final order that does not c…

Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Key Quotes

“Because the trial court's dismissal was without prejudice to file an amended motion, it is a non-final non-appealable order.”

Court's explanation for dismissing the appeal for lack of jurisdiction

Facts & Procedural History

Jason Wells appealed the trial court's dismissal without prejudice of his Rule 3.850 post-conviction motion, which allowed him thirty days to file a l…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court

FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

JASON WELLS, Appellant,

V.

STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

Case No. 5D2025-1897 LT Case No. 2022-CF-000263-A

3.850 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Sumter County. Mary P. Hatcher, Judge.

Jason Wells, Madison, pro se.

James Uthmeier, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Roberts J. Bradford, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

June 26, 2026

PER CURIAM.

Appellant Jason Wells appeals the trial court's dismissal without prejudice of his Rule 3.850 post-conviction motion. In its order, the trial court allowed Wells thirty days to file a legally sufficient amended motion.

Because the trial court's dismissal was without prejudice to file an amended motion, it is a non-final non-appealable order. See Young v. State, 398 So. 3d 1133, 1133 (Fla. 5th DCA 2024). Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal without prejudice for want of jurisdiction. Wells may file an amended Rule 3.850 motion within sixty days of the date on which this Court's opinion becomes final. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.850(h)(2), (m).

DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

WALLIS, HARRIS, and SOUD, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw