RALPH ODEN ANDERSON, PETITIONER,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT

Citator

Cited By (11 total)

• Chrysler Leasing Corp. v. Passacantilli, 259 So. 2d 1 (Fla. 1972)
  …ber 1, 1947, and gave the parties six months after dismissal to seek reinstatement for good cause. . The Third District Court of Appeal has reached this result explicitly several times in the past. See City of Miami v. Railway Express Agency, Inc., 141 So. 2d 285 (Fla.App.3rd, 1962), in which the court said: “ . . . defendant’s motion to dismiss for want of prosecution was not made until four days after the plaintiff had progressed the case by setting down the pending motion [to produce physicians’ reports].…
• Nelson v. Stonewall Ins. Co., 440 So. 2d 664 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983)
  …miss third-party complaint); Milu, Inc. v. Duke, 256 So. 2d 83 (Fla. 3d DCA 1971) (plaintiff’s notice of hearing); Cypress Corp. of Florida v. Smith, 218 So. 2d 481 (Fla. 2d DCA 1969) (filing of answer); City of Miami v. Railway Express Agency Inc., 141 So. 2d 285 (Fla. 3d DCA 1962) (plaintiff’s notice of hearing defendant’s motion for production of medical reports). . Marschall v. Water-Boggan International, Inc., supra, and Johnson v. Mortgage Investors of Washington, supra, relied on by plaintiff, are not…
• Kenet v. Stein, 326 So. 2d 36 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976)
  …rogress the cause between himself and the defendant through securing an order of court by noticing a hearing on the third party defendant’s motion to dismiss the third party complaint. See City of Miami v. Railway Express Agency, Inc., Fla.App.1962, 141 So. 2d 285; and Milu, Inc. v. Duke, Fla.App.1971, 256 So. 2d 83. Defendant’s position that because the action affected only the third party complaint, it could not reasonably be interpreted as progressing the cause is not well taken. Until there was some depos…