LOUIS RUBIN
v.
SWINK INNOVATIONS INC.
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The trial court's judgment is affirmed where the appellant has not demonstrated an abuse of discretion.
Louis Rubin appealed a judgment entered against him in small claims court in Indian River County. The case involved a dispute between Rubin and Swink …
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Pro Se Representation cases and more on FLexlaw
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
FOURTH DISTRICT
LOUIS RUBIN, Appellant,
v.
SWINK INNOVATIONS, INC., Appellee.
No. 4D2023-2577
[April 10, 2024]
Appeal from the County Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, Indian River County; Robyn
E.
Stone, Judge;
L.T.
Case No. 312023SC001500.
Louis Rubin, Grant, pro se.
No brief filed on behalf of appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Walker v. Estate of Yee, 376 So. 3d 758, 758 (Fla. 4th DCA 2024).
KLINGENSMITH, C.J., CIKLIN and FORST, JJ., concur.
* * *
Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.