LASHAY ALEXANDER SMITH, JR.
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A probation revocation order must conform in its written form to the trial court's oral pronouncement at the revocation hearing.
[1] A trial court's written probation revocation order must conform to the oral pronouncement made at the revocation hearing, and an amended order that deviates from such ora…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceSmith appealed the revocation of his probation. The trial court issued an amended order of revocation that deviated from its oral pronouncement regard…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Written Order cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
As Lashay Smith argues and the State concedes, the trial court's amended order of revocation of Smith's probation still deviates from the court's oral pronouncement at the revocation hearing concerning the conditions of probation that it found Smith to have violated. Accordingly, although we affirm the revocation of Smith's probation, we remand for the entry of a second amended order of revocation that fully conforms to the trial court's oral pronouncement at the revocation hearing.
Affirmed; remanded with directions.
SILBERMAN, BLACK, and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.