SMOOT
v.
SMOOT

Fla. 1st DCA | 2024-06-12
No. 2023-0698
Duncan, J., Lewis, J., Ray, J., Kelsey, J.
2024 FL 6893 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2024)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

Assets acquired separately by one party before marriage are nonmarital property and do not become marital property absent evidence of enhancement, commingling, or intent to gift.


Headnotes

[1] A premarital asset acquired by one spouse before marriage and maintained under sole control without evidence of enhancement, commingling, or intent to gift remains nonmar…

Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Key Quotes

“assets that are acquired separately by one party before the marriage are nonmarital assets”

Court citing Fla. Stat. § 61.075(6)(b)1. (2020) to establish the governing legal standard

Facts & Procedural History

Kenneth Smoot acquired a First National Bank of Omaha CD account ten years before marrying Luz Minerva Smoot and maintained sole control over it throu…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Per_curiam
Per Curiam

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D2023-0698 _____________________________

KENNETH HENRY SMOOT,

Appellant,

v.

LUZ MINERVA SMOOT,

Appellee. _____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Santa Rosa County.

J. Scott Duncan, Judge.

June 12, 2024

PER CURIAM.

Kenneth Henry Smoot seeks review of the final judgment dissolving his marriage to Luz Minerva Smoot. On appeal, he raises several arguments. Only one merits discussion. Below, the trial court included one of Mr. Smoot’s First National Bank of Omaha CD accounts in the equitable distribution schedule. But assets that are acquired separately by one party before the marriage are nonmarital assets. § 61.075(6)(b)1., Fla. Stat. (2020). Here, the unrebutted evidence established that Mr. Smoot acquired the account ten years before he married Ms. Smoot and maintained sole control over it during the marriage. There was no evidence of any circumstances that would transform this nonmarital asset into a marital asset. See Street v. Street, 303 So.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________

E. Jane Thorsen and Therese Felth McKenzie of McKenzie Law

Firm, Pensacola, for Appellant.

Luz Minerva Smoot, pro se, Appellee.

Footnotes
2 3d 1253, 1257 (Fla. 2d DCA 2020) (holding that the husband’s stocks acquired prior to the marriage were nonmarital and did not become marital in the absence of evidence of enhancement, commingling, or an intent to gift them to the wife). Therefore, the trial court erred in classifying the account as marital property subject to equitable distribution. Under these circumstances, the final judgment is reversed to allow the trial court to remove this asset from the distribution schedule and adjust the schedule accordingly. Otherwise, the judgment is affirmed. AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part, and REMANDED. LEWIS, RAY, and KELSEY, JJ., concur.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw