GUILLERMO FUENTES
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Mere invocation of the words 'manifest injustice' without factual support is insufficient to overcome a procedural bar to appellate review.
[1] To overcome a procedural bar to appellate review based on manifest injustice, a party must allege specific facts demonstrating manifest injustice; conclusory assertions o…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“The mere incantation of the words 'manifest injustice' does not make it so. [Appellant] has failed to allege any facts—nor can he—to justify invoking the extremely limited concept of manifest injustice to excuse a procedural bar and allow us to review the merits of his instant claim.”
Court's application of the manifest injustice standard to appellant's procedurally barred claims
Guillermo Fuentes appealed from a circuit court decision in Miami-Dade County under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2), raising claims th…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Florida Rule Of Criminal Procedure 3.850(B) cases and more on FLexlaw
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed August 7, 2024. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________
No. 3D24-0638 Lower Tribunal No. F93-30017 ________________
Guillermo Fuentes, Appellant,
vs.
The State of Florida, Appellee.
An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Laura Anne Stuzin, Judge.
Guillermo Fuentes, in proper person.
Ashley Moody, Attorney General, for appellee.
Before LOGUE, C.J., and LOBREE and BOKOR, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.850(b); Beiro v. State, 289 So. 3d 511,