LORENZO GOLPHIN
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA

Fla. 6th DCA | 2024-09-06
No. 2023-0775
White, J., Brownlee, J., Gannam, J., Franklin, Sharon M.
413 So. 3d 828 2024 FL 10836 Florida District Court of Appeal, Sixth District (2024) Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Holding

A trial court errs by imposing prosecution costs exceeding the statutory minimum of $100 without proof of higher costs incurred, and by imposing supervision and monitoring charges when the defendant received a life sentence rather than probation or community control.

Headnotes

[1] When a trial court imposes the statutory minimum prosecution costs of $100 per felony case, it may not impose additional prosecution costs without proof that the state in…

[2] Supervision and monitoring charges are inapplicable to a defendant sentenced to life imprisonment rather than probation or community control.

Previewing 2 of 2 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence
Key Quotes

“Costs for the state attorney must be set in all cases at . . . no less than $100 per case when a felony offense is charged . . . . The court may set a higher amount upon a showing of sufficient proof of higher costs incurred.”

Court citing Florida Statute § 938.27(8) regarding mandatory prosecution costs.
Facts & Procedural History

Lorenzo Golphin was convicted of lewd molestation and sentenced to life imprisonment. The trial court imposed a Monetary Obligations Order charging $2…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.

Topics
Judgment Lien Lewd Or Lascivious Molestation

Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Judgment Lien cases and more on FLexlaw

Opinion of the Court
Gannam

SIXTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

Case No. 6D2023-0775 Lower Tribunal No. CF21-009413-XX _____________________________

LORENZO GOLPHIN, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. _____________________________

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Polk County. Sharon M. Franklin, Judge.

September 6, 2024

WHITE, J.

Lorenzo Golphin appeals the judgment and sentence entered after he was found guilty of lewd molestation.1 Golphin argues that the Monetary Obligations Order improperly imposes “Additional SAO Costs of Prosecution Fees” of $200 and

2

various supervision and monitoring charges, and the Judgment Lien improperly imposes “Cost of Prosecution” of $200.2 We agree. “Costs for the state attorney must be set in all cases at . . . no less than $100 per case when a felony offense is charged . . . . The court may set a higher amount upon a showing of sufficient proof of higher costs incurred.” § 938.27(8), Fla. Stat. (2021). Here, the statutory mandatory minimum amount of $100 for costs of prosecution is included in the $513 total costs for “Felony” in the Monetary Obligations Order. The State did not request a higher amount or submit proof that it incurred more than $100 for costs of prosecution. Therefore, the trial court erred by ordering Golphin to pay “Additional SAO Costs of Prosecution Fees” of $200 in the Monetary Obligations Order, and “Cost of Prosecution” of $200 in the Judgment Lien.3 State, 342 So. 3d 298, 299 (Fla. 5th DCA 2022). The trial court also erred by ordering payment of various supervision and monitoring charges in the Monetary Obligations Order. Those charges are inapplicable here because Golphin did not receive a sentence of probation or community control. He received a life sentence.

3

For the foregoing reasons, we reverse the improperly imposed provisions of the Monetary Obligations Order and the Judgment Lien. On remand, the trial court shall enter a corrected Monetary Obligations Order excluding the “Additional SAO Costs of Prosecution Fees” of $200 and various supervision and monitoring charges,4 and a corrected Judgment Lien excluding the “Cost of Prosecution” of $200. Golphin’s presence is not required for those ministerial corrections. See Ayos v. State, 275 So. 3d 178, 182 (Fla. 4th DCA 2019). Otherwise, we affirm the judgment and sentence without further discussion. AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part; REMANDED with instructions. BROWNLEE and GANNAM, JJ., concur.

Howard L. “Rex” Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Daniel Muller, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and David Campbell, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING

AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF TIMELY FILED

Footnotes
1 This case was transferred from the Second District Court of Appeal to this Court on January 1, 2023.
2 Golphin’s timely rule 3.800(b)(2) motion requested that the trial court correct those errors. That motion was deemed denied, however, because the trial court did not rule on it within 60 days. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.800(b)(2)(B). 3 Although described differently in the order than it is in the lien, the $200 charge in both documents is for the same thing.
3 See Wasden v.
4 Under “FDOC costs and fees,” no box shall be checked, except the box reserving jurisdiction “per F.S. 960.291, et. seq.”

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw