RAKIM LAMAR BLOUNT
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
An appeal must be dismissed or affirmed summarily when it does not present a legally dispositive issue expressly reserved for appellate review.
[1] An appellate court may summarily affirm when the appeal does not present a legally dispositive issue expressly reserved for appellate review.
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“requiring summary affirmance when appeal does not present legally dispositive issue expressly reserved for appellate review”
The court cited Boyd v. State, 336 So. 3d 838 (Fla. 5th DCA 2022) for the standard governing summary affirmance.
Rakim Lamar Blount appealed a judgment from the Circuit Court for Seminole County in a criminal case (Case No. 2022-CF-000985-A). Blount proceeded pro…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Summary Affirmance cases and more on FLexlaw
FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
STATE OF FLORIDA
_____________________________ Case No. 5D2023-3118 LT Case No. 2022-CF-000985-A _____________________________ RAKIM LAMAR BLOUNT, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. _____________________________ On appeal from the Circuit Court for Seminole County. Jessica J. Recksiedler, Judge. Rakim Lamar Blount, Defuniak Springs, pro se. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Pamela J. Koller, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee. November 26, 2024
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED. See Boyd v. State, 336 So. 3d 838 (Fla. 5th DCA 2022) (“requiring summary affirmance when appeal does not present legally dispositive issue expressly reserved for appellate review” (citing Leonard v. State, 760 So. 2d 114, 119 (Fla. 2000))). JAY, BOATWRIGHT, and MACIVER, JJ., concur.
2 _____________________________