DAVID INGRAHAM
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The habeas corpus petition was denied.
David Ingraham filed a habeas corpus petition in the Third District Court of Appeal. The petition arose from a lower tribunal case numbered F89-12383C…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Petition For Relief cases and more on FLexlaw
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed January 29, 2025. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________
No. 3D24-1028 Lower Tribunal No. F89-12383C ________________
David Ingraham, Petitioner,
vs.
State of Florida, Respondent.
A Case of Original Jurisdiction – Habeas Corpus.
The Law Office of Zirpoli Chase and Lindsay Chase (Hollywood), for petitioner.
John Guard, Acting Attorney General, and Linda Katz, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
Before FERNANDEZ, MILLER, and LOBREE, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
2 Denied. See Pedroza v. State, 291 So. 3d 541 (Fla. 2020); see also Ingraham v. State, 314 So. 3d 715 (Fla. 3d DCA 2021).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Pedroza v. State, 291 So. 3d 541 (Fla. 2020)
- Ingraham v. State, 314 So. 3d 715 (Fla. 3d DCA 2021)