DENVER IVAN WILSON
v.
CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT, SEMINOLE COUNTY, FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The trial court's order granting summary final judgment is affirmed, and the appellant is cautioned that further pro se filings asserting claims from the underlying cases may result in sanctions.
[1] A court may sanction a pro se litigant for abusive, repetitive, malicious, or frivolous postconviction filings by imposing sanctions such as a bar on pro se filing and re…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceDenver Ivan Wilson, proceeding pro se, filed multiple postconviction motions and petitions for writ of mandamus in Seminole County Circuit Court cases…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Summary Final Judgment cases and more on FLexlaw
FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
STATE OF FLORIDA
_____________________________
Case No. 5D2024-0240 LT Case No. 2019-CA-3319 _____________________________
DENVER IVAN WILSON,
Appellant,
v.
CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT, SEMINOLE COUNTY, FLORIDA,
Appellee. _____________________________
On appeal from the Circuit Court for Seminole County. Christopher M. Sprysenski, Judge.
Denver Ivan Wilson, Lake Butler, pro se.
Richard S. Wright, of Wright & Casey, P.A., New Smyrna Beach, for Appellee.
March 28, 2025
PER CURIAM.
This Court affirms the trial court’s order granting Appellee’s motion for summary final judgment and has previously either affirmed, denied, or dismissed three motions for postconviction relief and nine petitions for writ of mandamus in Seminole County Circuit Court Case Nos. 1999-CF-907-A and 2019-CA-3319.
2 Because it appears that Appellant’s postconviction filings are abusive, repetitive, malicious, or frivolous, Appellant is cautioned that any further pro se filings in this Court, asserting claims stemming from Seminole County Circuit Court Case Nos. 1999- CF-907-A and 2019-CA-3319, may result in sanctions such as a bar on pro se filing in this Court and referral to prison officials for disciplinary proceedings, which may include forfeiture of gain time. See § 944.279(1), Fla. Stat. (2024); State v. Spencer, 751 So. 2d 47 (Fla. 1999).
AFFIRMED; APPELLANT CAUTIONED.
MAKAR, BOATWRIGHT, and MACIVER, JJ., concur.
_____________________________
Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________