MICHAEL PARKS
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Upon revocation of a youthful offender's probation for a substantive violation, the trial court is authorized to impose either another youthful offender sentence with no minimum mandatory or an adult Criminal Punishment Code sentence with any applicable minimum mandatory term.
[1] Upon revocation of a youthful offender's probation for a substantive violation, the trial court may impose either a youthful offender sentence without minimum mandatory t…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceMichael Parks, a youthful offender, had his probation revoked for a substantive violation. The trial court imposed a sentence following this revocatio…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Youthful Offender Sentencing cases and more on FLexlaw
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed April 30, 2025. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________
No. 3D25-0313 Lower Tribunal No. F10-6731 ________________
Michael Parks, Appellant,
vs.
State of Florida, Appellee.
An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Miguel M. de la O, Judge.
Michael Parks, in proper person.
James Uthmeier, Attorney General, and Ivy R. Ginsberg, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
Before FERNANDEZ, MILLER and GOODEN, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
2
Affirmed. See Eustache v. State, 248 So. 3d 1097, 1100-01 (Fla. 2018) (holding, upon revocation of a youthful offender’s probation for a substantive violation, the trial court is authorized to either impose another youthful offender sentence with no minimum mandatory, or to impose an adult Criminal Punishment Code sentence, which would require imposition of any minimum mandatory term of incarceration associated with the offense of conviction); Parks v. State, 256 So. 3d 969, 970 (Fla. 3d DCA 2018).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Eustache v. State, 248 So. 3d 1097 (Fla. 2018)
- Parks v. State, 256 So. 3d 969 (Fla. 3d DCA 2018)