DOUGLAS M. LLOYD
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A habeas corpus petition raising issues whose merits have been previously considered and rejected or are procedurally barred must be dismissed.
[1] A habeas corpus petition raising issues whose merits have been previously considered and rejected by the court or other courts, or that are procedurally barred, may be di…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceDouglas Lloyd filed a habeas corpus petition challenging his criminal convictions. Lloyd had previously filed successive and repetitive collateral att…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Postconviction Motion cases and more on FLexlaw
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed May 7, 2025. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________
No. 3D25-0029 Lower Tribunal No. F98-19062 A ________________
Douglas M. Lloyd, Petitioner,
vs.
The State of Florida, Respondent.
A Case of Original Jurisdiction – Habeas Corpus.
Douglas M. Lloyd, in proper person.
James Uthmeier, Attorney General, and Linda Katz, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
Before SCALES, LINDSEY, and GORDO, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
2
Petitioner Douglas Lloyd has filed successive and repetitive collateral attacks on his criminal convictions on essentially the same grounds. This Court denied habeas petitions by this petitioner in 2005 and 2017. The Florida Supreme Court denied review of our 2005 ruling. Lloyd v. McDonough, 935 So. 2d 122 (Fla. 2006). This Court affirmed the denial of postconviction motions raising similar claims in 2007, 2015, 2020, and 2022. A federal court also denied a habeas petition by this petitioner after thorough consideration of each claim. See Lloyd v. McNeil, 08-21660-CIV, 2009 WL 2424576, at *5 (S.D. Fla. Aug. 5, 2009). In the instant Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, Lloyd raises issues whose merits have been considered and rejected by this Court and others or are otherwise procedurally barred. We therefore dismiss the Petition. See Baker v. State, 878 So. 2d 1236 (Fla. 2004). Dismissed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Baker v. State, 878 So. 2d 1236 (Fla. 2004)
- Palm Beach Primary Care Assocs., Inc. v. Saima Mufti, M.D., 935 So. 2d 122 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006)