TINIKO BRADDY THOMPSON
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A Rule 3.800 motion to correct sentencing errors was properly denied by the trial court.
Tiniko Braddy Thompson filed a Rule 3.800 motion in the Circuit Court for Broward County challenging her sentence in a criminal case. The trial court …
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Ineffective Assistance Of Counsel Standard cases and more on FLexlaw
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
FOURTH DISTRICT
TINIKO BRADDY THOMPSON, Appellant,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.
No. 4D2025-0544
[May 7, 2025]
Appeal of order denying rule 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Susan L. Alspector, Judge; L.T. Case No. 14-007484-CF10A.
Tiniko Braddy Thompson, Ocala, pro se.
No appearance for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Ratliff v. State, 914 So. 2d 938, 940 (Fla. 2005); Padgett v. State, No. 3D25-0349, 2025 WL 1172840, at *1 (Fla. 3d DCA Apr. 23, 2025).
KLINGENSMITH, C.J., GROSS and DAMOORGIAN, JJ., concur.
* * *