VICTOR HICKS
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A pro se litigant who files repeated, abusive, repetitive, malicious, or frivolous petitions may be sanctioned by barring further pro se filings and referral to prison officials for disciplinary proceedings.
[1] A court may sanction a pro se litigant for filing repeated, abusive, repetitive, malicious, or frivolous petitions by imposing sanctions including a bar on further pro se…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“In light of Petitioner's repeated filings that appear to be abusive, repetitive, malicious, or frivolous, Petitioner is cautioned that any further pro se filings in this Court relating to the aforementioned case numbers may result in sanctions.”
Court's warning to petitioner regarding future filings
Victor Hicks, proceeding pro se, filed a petition for writ of prohibition (treated as mandamus) arising from Hernando County Circuit Court cases. This…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Prison Disciplinary Proceedings cases and more on FLexlaw
FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
STATE OF FLORIDA
_____________________________
Case No. 5D2024-2733 LT Case Nos. 2023-CF-1307-A 2024-CA-577 _____________________________
VICTOR HICKS,
Petitioner,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Respondent. _____________________________
Petition for Writ of Mandamus. Stephen E. Toner, Jr., Respondent Judge.
Victor Hicks, Malone, pro se.
No Appearance for Respondent.
May 16, 2025
PER CURIAM.
This Court previously denied Petitioner’s petition for writ of prohibition, which was treated as a writ of mandamus, arising from Hernando County Circuit Court Case Nos. 2023-CF-1307-A and 2024-CA-577. In light of Petitioner’s repeated filings that appear to be abusive, repetitive, malicious, or frivolous, Petitioner is cautioned that any further pro se filings in this Court relating to the aforementioned case numbers may result in sanctions. Such
2 sanctions may include a bar on further pro se filing in this Court and referral to prison officials for disciplinary proceedings, which could include forfeiture of gain time. See § 944.279(1), Fla. Stat. (2024); State v. Spencer, 751 So. 2d 47 (Fla. 1999).
PETITIONER WARNED.
WALLIS, EISNAUGLE, and PRATT, JJ., concur.