LEWIS JOSEPH HAWTHORNE
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA

Fla. 3d DCA | 2025-06-04
No. 2023-2286
Logue, C.J., Lobree, J., Bokor, J., Hersch, J.
2025 FL 4598 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2025)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

A curative instruction is generally sufficient to dispel the prejudicial effect of an objectionable comment made during trial.


Headnotes

[1] A curative instruction is generally sufficient to remedy the prejudicial effect of an objectionable comment made during trial.

Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Key Quotes

“Generally speaking, the use of a curative instruction to dispel the prejudicial effect of an objectionable comment is sufficient.”

Court's citation to Talley v. State in affirming the judgment

Facts & Procedural History

Lewis Joseph Hawthorne appealed a conviction from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County. The trial involved an objectionable comment that was addres…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
Logue

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Opinion filed June 4, 2025. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D23-2286 Lower Tribunal No. F23-14286 ________________

Lewis Joseph Hawthorne, Appellant,

vs.

The State of Florida, Appellee.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Richard Hersch, Judge.

Carlos J. Martinez, Public Defender, and Manuel Alvarez, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.

James Uthmeier, Attorney General, and Ivy R. Ginsberg, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before LOGUE, C.J., and LOBREE and BOKOR, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

2

Affirmed. See Talley v. State, 260 So. 3d 562, 571-72 (Fla. 3d DCA 2019) (“Generally speaking, the use of a curative instruction to dispel the prejudicial effect of an objectionable comment is sufficient.” (citing Jennings v. State, 124 So. 3d 257, 266 (Fla. 3d DCA 2013))).


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw