JERRIE M. BAIST
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA

Fla. 3d DCA | 2025-06-04
No. 2025-0484
Hernandez, J., Gordo, J., Bokor, J., Gooden, J.
2025 FL 4623 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2025)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

A sentence of life imprisonment is sufficiently definite so that it can be understood and applied.


Headnotes

[1] A sentence of life imprisonment is sufficiently definite to satisfy requirements that a sentence be capable of being understood and applied.

Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Key Quotes

“a sentence of life imprisonment is 'sufficiently definite so that it can be understood and applied.'”

Court citing Ratliff v. State, 914 So. 2d 938, 940 (Fla. 2005)

Facts & Procedural History

Jerrie M. Baist appealed a life sentence imposed by the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County.…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
Gooden

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Opinion filed June 4, 2025. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D25-0484 Lower Tribunal No. F94-26476 ________________

Jerrie M. Baist, Appellant,

vs.

State of Florida, Appellee.

An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Christine Hernandez, Judge.

Jerrie M. Baist, in proper person.

James Uthmeier, Attorney General, for appellee.

Before GORDO, BOKOR and GOODEN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

2

As the Florida Supreme Court, this court, and numerous courts of this state have held, a sentence of life imprisonment is “sufficiently definite so that it can be understood and applied.” Ratliff v. State, 914 So. 2d 938, 940 (Fla. 2005); see also Holmes v. State, 245 So. 3d 857, 858 (Fla. 3d DCA 2018) (applying Ratliff in affirming a life sentence).

Affirmed.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw