U.S. ALLIANCE MANAGEMENT CORP., ETC.

v.

APEIRON MIAMI, LLC, ETC.

2 Security”), appeals the trial court’s entry of final summary judgment in favor of appellee Apeiron Miami, LLC (“Apeiron”). Because the trial court properly found Apeiron tendered to U.S. Security an amount of money equal to the sum of the worthless check, the service charge, court costs and incurred bank fees “before the hearing,” in satisfaction of the worthless check count, we affirm. See § 68.065(6), Fla. Stat. (2018); see also F & A Dairy Prods., Inc. v. Imperial Food Distribs., Inc., 798 So. 2d 803, 804 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001) (“Tendering the sum to the court would, in our view, constitute good faith compliance with the statute and would preclude a claim for treble damages.” (quoting Krontz v. Feiler, 553 So. 2d 1302, 1303 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989))). As to that portion of the appeal challenging a post-judgment order determining that Apeiron is entitled to recover attorney’s fees,1 we dismiss because no notice of appeal or amended notice of appeal was filed directed to that order, see Dunaj v. Worley, 400 So. 3d 756 (Fla. 3d DCA 2024), and, in any event, such an order is not ripe for review. See Yampol v. Turnberry Isle S. Condo. Ass’n, 250 So. 3d 835, 837 (Fla. 3d DCA 2018) (“An order granting entitlement to attorney’s fees but not determining the amount of fees or costs

3 is a non-final, non-appealable order, and such an order is subject to dismissal for lack of jurisdiction.”). After careful review of the remaining arguments raised by U.S. Security, we affirm without further discussion. Affirmed in part; dismissed in part.