JAMES RAY BOOTH
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Even if Erlinger v. United States constitutes a change of law, it does not apply retroactively.
[1] A change in law established by a United States Supreme Court decision does not apply retroactively to cases that were final before the decision was rendered.
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceJames Ray Booth appealed from a circuit court decision in a criminal case (case number 2006-CF-002030-A) in Hernando County.…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Retroactive Application Of Statutes cases and more on FLexlaw
FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
STATE OF FLORIDA
_____________________________ Case No. 5D2025-1312 LT Case No. 2006-CF-002030-A _____________________________ JAMES RAY BOOTH, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. _____________________________ 3.800 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hernando County. Daniel B. Merritt, Jr., Judge. James Ray Booth, Bushnell, pro se. No Appearance for Appellee. June 24, 2025
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED. See Wainwright v. State, 50 Fla. L. Weekly S108 (Fla. June 3, 2025) (concluding “even if Erlinger [v. United States, 602 U.S. 821 (2024),] constitutes a change of law, it does not apply retroactively.”). EDWARDS, C.J., and SOUD and MACIVER, JJ., concur.
2