HALL, JR.
v.
YOHOS AUTOMOTIVE AND TOWING, YOHO
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
An appeal of a trial court's order denying a motion for recusal is nonfinal and nonappealable under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.130(a)(3) and must be treated as a petition for writ of prohibition.
[1] An order denying a motion for recusal of a judge is nonfinal and nonappealable under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.130(a)(3) and must be treated as a petition for…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceOdell Hall, Jr. filed a motion for recusal and change of venue in a county court action. The trial court denied both motions.…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Florida Rule Of Appellate Procedure 9.130(A)(3) cases and more on FLexlaw
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA
SECOND DISTRICT
ODELL HALL, JR.,
Appellant,
v.
DANIELLE D. YOHO and YOHO'S AUTOMOTIVE AND TOWING,
Appellees.
No. 2D2024-2272
July 9, 2025
Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.130 from the County Court for Pinellas County; George M. Jirotka and Susan Bedinghaus, Judges.
Odell Hall, Jr., pro se.
No appearance for Appellees.
SLEET, Judge. Odell Hall, Jr., appeals the trial court's Order Denying Motion for Recusal and Change of Venue. Because the portion of the order addressing the trial court's denial of his motion for recusal is nonfinal and nonappealable under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.130(a)(3), we treat that portion of the appeal as a petition for writ of prohibition and deny the petition. See Kowalski v. Boyles, 557 So. 2d 885, 886 (Fla.
2 5th DCA 1990) (treating an appeal of a nonfinal order denying an application for disqualification of a judge as a petition for writ of prohibition). As to the part of the order denying Hall's motion for change of venue, we have jurisdiction, see Fla. R. App. P. 9.130(a)(3)(A), and affirm without further comment. Affirmed in part and denied in part.
MORRIS and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.
Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.