CAMILLE GROOM, ET AL.
v.
ESTATE OF SUSAN NAUGHTON, ET AL.
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The trial court's findings of fact in a non-jury trial are presumed correct and will not be disturbed unless totally unsupported by competent and substantial evidence, clearly against the weight of the evidence, or induced by an erroneous view of the law.
[1] In reviewing a final judgment from a non-jury trial, the trial court's findings of fact are presumed correct and will not be disturbed unless totally unsupported by compe…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“In reviewing a final judgment rendered from a non-jury trial, the trial court's findings of fact are clothed with a presumption of correctness. We apply a clear error standard to the findings of fact, and a finding will not be disturbed unless it is totally unsupported by competent and substantial evidence, it is clearly against the weight of the evidence, or it was induced by an erroneous view of the law.”
Statement of the standard of review applied to non-jury trial judgments
This case involved a dispute between Camille Groom and others against the Estate of Susan Naughton and others, decided by the trial court in a non-jur…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Trial Court Findings cases and more on FLexlaw
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed August 27, 2025. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
No. 3D24-0720 Lower Tribunal No. 18-2109-CA-01
Camille Groom, et al., Appellants, vs. Estate of Susan Naughton, et al., Appellees.
An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Migna Sanchez-Llorens, Judge.
Weinbaum P.A., and Lane Weinbaum (Coral Springs), for appellants. Clay Naughton, for appellees. Before FERNANDEZ, LINDSEY and BOKOR, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See La Ley Sports Complex at City of Homestead, LLC v.
City of Homestead, 255 So. 3d 468, 469 (Fla. 3d DCA 2018) (“In reviewing
a final judgment rendered from a non-jury trial, the trial court's findings of fact are clothed with a presumption of correctness. We apply a clear error standard to the findings of fact, and a finding will not be disturbed unless it is totally unsupported by competent and substantial evidence, it is clearly against the weight of the evidence, or it was induced by an erroneous view of the law. We review the trial court's conclusions of law and application of law to the facts de novo.”) (internal citations omitted).
2
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- La Ley Sports Complex at the City of Homestead, LLC v. City of Homestead, 255 So. 3d 468 (Fla. 3d DCA 2018)