COREY BUTLER
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A change in law established by Erlinger v. United States does not apply retroactively to cases already final on direct appeal.
[1] A change in law established by Erlinger v. …
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceCorey D. Butler appealed the denial of a rule 3.800 motion in two criminal cases from Broward County. The motion apparently relied on Erlinger v. Unit…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Rule 3.800 Motion cases and more on FLexlaw
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
FOURTH DISTRICT
COREY D. BUTLER, Appellant,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.
No. 4D2025-1384
[August 20, 2025]
Appeal of order denying rule 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Susan L. Alspector, Judge; L.T. Case Nos. 19-02531CF10A and 21-05088CF10A.
Corey D. Butler, Miami, pro se.
James Uthmeier, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Lindsay A. Warner, Senior Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Wainwright v. State, 411 So. 3d 392 (Fla. 2025), cert. denied sub nom. Wainwright v. Florida, No. 24-7365, 2025 WL 1621505 (U.S. June 9, 2025) (holding that even if Erlinger v. United States, 602 U.S. 821 (2024), constitutes a change of law, it does not apply retroactively).
KUNTZ, C.J., GERBER and FORST, JJ., concur.
* * *