MICHAEL BENNETT
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
When a trial court's oral pronouncement of sentence differs from the written sentencing document, the oral pronouncement controls and the written document must be corrected.
[1] When a trial court's oral pronouncement of sentence conflicts with the written sentencing document, the oral pronouncement controls and the written document must be corre…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“Because the court's oral pronouncement controls over the written sentence, we remand for the court to make the appropriate correction.”
Court's explanation for remanding the case for correction of the sentencing document
Michael Bennett was sentenced by the trial court to concurrent prison terms of eighty-four months (seven years). The written sentencing document mista…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
STATE OF FLORIDA
_____________________________ Case No. 5D2024-1502 LT Case No. 2022-CF-512 _____________________________ MICHAEL BENNETT, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. _____________________________ On appeal from the Circuit Court for Flagler County. Christopher Anthony France, Judge. Matthew J. Metz, Public Defender, and Andrew Mich, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant. Michael Bennett, Milton, pro se. James Uthmeier, Attorney General, Tallahassee, Rebecca Rock McGuigan and Marissa V. Giles, Assistant Attorneys General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee. August 22, 2025
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED; REMANDED with instructions.
JAY, C.J., and EDWARDS and KILBANE, JJ., concur.
_____________________________
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (U.S. 1967)
- Breman Wootton v. Iron Acquisitions, 338 So. 3d 425 (Fla. 2d DCA 2022)