SAM KAYE, APPELLANT,

v.

ROSALINA CAVADA AND MARIA CAVADA, APPELLEES

Citator

Cited By

• Schweiger v. Hoch, 223 So. 2d 557 (Fla. 4th DCA 1969)
  …val, by resolution, of the Board of Directors of Orlando Orange Groves Company. In the case sub judice there was not an actual assignment of contract between the plaintiffs and defendant. Nenow v. L. C. Cassidy & Son of Florida, Inc., Fla. App.1962, 141 So. 2d 636, also involved an assignment of assets from one corporation to another wherein stock was ex [*559] changed for assets, with the parties remaining the same. In the case of Smith, Bell & Hauck, Inc. v. Cullins, 1962, 123 Vt. 96, 183 A. 2d 528, it is…
• Orkin Exterminating Co. of Fla. Inc. v. Bragg, 23 Fla. Supp. 124 (Duval Cty. Cir. Ct. 1964)
  …elly (Fla. DCA2, 1962), 136 So. 2d 370; Tasty Box Lunch Co. v. Kennedy (Fla. DCA3, 1960), 121 So. 2d 52; Fountain v. Hudson (Fla. DCA3, 1960), 122 So. 2d 232; Beery v. Plastridge (Fla. DCA2, 1962), 142 So. 2d 332; Nenow v. Cassidy (Fla. DCA2, 1962), 141 So. 2d 636; and Approved Personnel v. Herman (Dade C.C., 1961), 19 Fla. Supp. 19. See also the annotation at 41 ALR 2d 102 and Orkin v. Truly Nolen (Fla. DCA3, 1960), 117 So. 2d 419, at 421, where reference is made to trade secrets and customer’s lists; and re…
• Pino v. Spanish Broad. Sys. OF Fla., Inc., 564 So. 2d 186 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990)
  …court ordered that, prior to the termination of the six-month period, a hearing will be held to "further consider the reasonableness of the length of time and scope of the non-competitive provisions." . In Nenow v. L.C. Cassidy & Son of Fla., Inc., 141 So. 2d 636 (Fla. 2d DCA 1962), the Second District addressed the issue of assignability of covenants not to compete where the assignee [*188] corporation was a subsidiary of the assignor. In Nenow, the court held that the employee's agreement not to compete wa…

Authorities Cited

• Thompson v. Food Fair Stores OF Fla., Inc., 107 So. 2d 393 (Fla. 3d DCA 1958)