STATE OF FLORIDA
v.
TAMMARA ESTER
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The State appealed a trial court's order withholding adjudication of guilt for a third-degree grand theft felony conviction. The defendant had two prior felony withholdings of adjudication from unrelated transactions. The court reversed, holding that statutory law prohibited withholding adjudication under these circumstances.
Under Florida Statutes section 775.08435(1)(d), a trial court is prohibited from withholding adjudication of guilt for a third-degree felony offense when the defendant has two or more prior withholdings of adjudication for felonies that did not arise from the same transaction as the current offense.
[1] A trial court lacks discretion to withhold adjudication of guilt for a third-degree felony when the defendant has two or more prior withholds of adjudication for felonies…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceTammara Ester was charged with grand theft of property valued between $300 and $5,000, a third-degree felony. She entered an open, no-contest plea to …
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Felony Offense cases and more on FLexlaw
KLINGENSMITH, J.
The State appeals an order withholding adjudication of Tammara Ester’s guilt. Prior to this, Ester had adjudication withheld for two unrelated felony charges. For the reasons stated below, we reverse.
Ester was charged by information with grand theft of property valued at $300 or more but less than $5,000, a third-degree felony. She entered an open, no-contest plea to the charge. During sentencing, the State objected to withholding adjudication of Ester’s guilt because she had two previous felony withholds of adjudication, neither of which arose from the grand theft charge before the trial court. Ultimately, the trial court sentenced Ester to six months of community control followed by thirty-six months of probation and withheld adjudication of guilt, over the State’s objection. This appeal followed.
Section 775.08435(1)(d), Florida Statutes (2018), states: “Notwithstanding any provision of this section, no adjudication of guilt shall be withheld for a third degree felony offense if the defendant has two or more prior withholdings of adjudication for a felony that did not arise from the same transaction as the current felony offense.” (emphasis added).
Under the language of section 775.08435(1)(d), the trial judge in this case was prohibited from withholding adjudication. See State v. Jean, 114 So. 3d 451, 452 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013). Accordingly, we reverse the sentence and remand for the trial court to re-sentence the defendant in accordance with section 775.08435. See id.
Reversed and remanded. CONNER and KUNTZ, JJ., concur. * * * Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
State v. Charlton (Fla. 4th DCA 2020)
Authorities Cited
- State v. Jean, 114 So. 3d 451 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013)