SHANE PATRICK WEAVER
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA

Fla. 5th DCA | 2025-09-05
No. 2024-2956
Hodges, J., Makar, J., Soud, J., Pratt, J.
2025 FL 7698 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (2025)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The judgment and sentence are affirmed, but the case is reversed and remanded for entry of an amended judgment and sentence to include the public defender application fee in the cost order.


Headnotes

[1] A trial court's omission of a public defender application fee from a cost order, despite pronouncing the fee at sentencing, constitutes a scrivener's error that may be co…

Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Facts & Procedural History

Shane Patrick Weaver was convicted and sentenced in Marion County Circuit Court. At sentencing, the trial court failed to include the public defender …

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Per_curiam
Per Curiam

FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________ Case No. 5D2024-2956 LT Case No. 2024-CF-001055-A _____________________________ SHANE PATRICK WEAVER, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. _____________________________ On appeal from the Circuit Court for Marion County. Robert William Hodges, Judge. Matthew J. Metz, Public Defender, and Allison A. Havens, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant. James Uthmeier, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Daniel P. Caldwell, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee. September 5, 2025

PER CURIAM.

Shane Patrick Weaver seeks review of his judgment and sentence in this Anders* appeal. Having reviewed the record, we * Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).

2 affirm as Weaver’s judgment and sentence but note that the cost of the public defender application fee, which was pronounced at Weaver’s sentencing directly following his trial, was not included in the cost order. We reverse solely for the entry of an amended judgment and sentence to correct for the amount of the public defender application fee. See Fucci v. State, 403 So. 3d 1091 (Fla. 5th DCA 2025); see also Mneimne v. State, 408 So. 3d 129 (Fla. 5th DCA 2025).

AFFIRMED, in part; REVERSED, in part; and REMANDED with instructions.

MAKAR and SOUD, JJ., concur. PRATT, J., concurs in part and dissents in part, with opinion.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw