NICKEOUS LAMONT JENKINS
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The trial court's judgment is affirmed, though the trial court should review the sentencing scoresheet to correct a potential scrivener's error in the offense level.
[1] A trial court should review a sentencing scoresheet to correct a potential scrivener's error in the offense level assigned to a conviction, even when the underlying judgm…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceNickeous Lamont Jenkins was convicted in Lake County Circuit Court (Case No. 2023-CF-1386-A). He appealed the conviction and sentence.…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Sentencing Scoresheet cases and more on FLexlaw
FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
STATE OF FLORIDA
_____________________________
Case No. 5D2024-2600 LT Case No. 2023-CF-1386-A _____________________________
NICKEOUS LAMONT JENKINS,
Appellant,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellee. _____________________________
On appeal from the Circuit Court for Lake County. James R. Baxley, Judge.
Matthew J. Metz, Public Defender, and Jane Almy, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.
Nickeous Lamont Jenkins, Sneads, pro se.
James Uthmeier, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Marissa V. Giles, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.
October 24, 2025
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED.
WALLIS and MACIVER, JJ., concur. MAKAR, J., concurs with opinion.
2 _____________________________
Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________
Case No. 5D2024-2600 Lt. Case No. 2023-CF-1386-A MAKAR, J., concurring. I concur in affirmance and point out that the trial court should review the scoresheet to correct a potential scrivener’s error arising from the level assigned to Appellant’s conviction. See Ruh v. State, 325 So. 3d 158, 158– 59 (Fla. 5th DCA 2020) (remanding to correct scrivener’s error in scoresheet); Woodward v. State, 310 So. 3d 122, 123 (Fla. 2d DCA 2020) (same); Benjamin v. State, 283 So. 3d 828, 829 (Fla. 1st DCA 2019) (same); Penn v. State, 190 So. 3d 258, 259 (Fla. 1st DCA 2016) (same); Jones v. State, 96 So. 3d 1122, 1122 (Fla. 5th DCA 2012) (same). 3