TARON JACQUETT
v.
ESTEFANIA JACQUETT
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The trial court's judgment is affirmed because the appellant failed to provide an adequate record to demonstrate reversible error.
[1] An appellant in appellate proceedings bears the burden of demonstrating reversible error through an adequate record, and the trial court's judgment is presumed correct ab…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“In appellate proceedings the decision of a trial court has the presumption of correctness and the burden is on the appellant to demonstrate error.”
Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So. 2d 1150, 1152 (Fla. 1979)
This is a family law case (domestic relations) involving Taron Jacquett and Estefania Jacquett. The trial court entered a final judgment in the case.…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Presumption Of Correctness Of Trial Court Decisions cases and more on FLexlaw
SIXTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
STATE OF FLORIDA
_____________________________
Case No. 6D2024-2519 Lower Tribunal No. 2021-DR-003477 _____________________________
TARON JACQUETT, Appellant, v. ESTEFANIA JACQUETT, Appellee. _____________________________
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Osceola County. Christy C. Collins, Judge.
October 24, 2025
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So. 2d 1150, 1152 (Fla. 1979) (“In appellate proceedings the decision of a trial court has the presumption of correctness and the burden is on the appellant to demonstrate error. . . . The trial court should have been affirmed because the record brought forward by the appellant is inadequate to demonstrate reversible error.”); Robinson v. Robinson, 50 Fla. L. Weekly D1997, D1997 (Fla. 6th DCA Sept. 5, 2025) (stating that where error appears for first time on final judgment’s face, party must alert trial court to
2
error through motion for rehearing or some other appropriate motion to preserve it for appeal); Julia v. Ramos-Baez, 395 So. 3d 1121, 1123 (Fla. 6th DCA 2024) (“Without the transcript of the relevant proceeding, an appellate court cannot conduct ‘an examination of the entire case’ to determine whether the trial court actually failed to make the required findings.” (quoting § 59.041, Fla. Stat.)). TRAVER, C.J., and MIZE and BROWNLEE, JJ., concur.
Taron Jacquett, Saint Cloud, pro se.
Ronda Denise Westfall, of The Westfall Law Firm, P.A., Orlando, for Appellee.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING
AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF TIMELY FILED
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Somma v. Metra Elecs. Corp., 727 So. 2d 302 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999)
- Julia v. Ramos-Baez, 395 So. 3d 1121 (Fla. 6th DCA 2024)