JIM CONSTANTACOS, ET AL.
v.
GOLDEN ISLES TOWERS CONDOMINIUM ASSOC., INC.
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The trial court's order is affirmed where the appellate record does not demonstrate reversible error, even absent a detailed explanation from the trial court.
[1] A trial court's order may be affirmed on appeal where the appellate record demonstrates no reversible error, notwithstanding the trial court's failure to provide a detail…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“Because we are unable to conclude, based on our record, that the trial court erred . . . we affirm . . . . However, it would have been easier to assess the correctness of the trial court's order if some explanation had been provided.”
Court's reasoning for affirmance despite lack of trial court explanation
Jim Constantacos, as trustee of the Florcon Trust, along with Yves Dion, Francois Paradis, and Igor Anchipolovsky, appealed a circuit court order in a…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Standard Of Appellate Review cases and more on FLexlaw
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
FOURTH DISTRICT
JIM CONSTANTACOS, as Trustee of the FLORCON TRUST DATED 6/4/2010, YVES DION, FRANCOIS PARADIS, and IGOR ANCHIPOLOVSKY, Appellants,
v.
GOLDEN ISLES TOWERS CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC., Appellee.
No. 4D2024-1455
[November 12, 2025]
Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Fabienne E. Fahnestock, Judge; L.T. Case No. CACE-20- 003112.
Jeremy Dicker of Sachs Sax Caplan, Boca Raton, for appellants.
Therese A. Savona of Cole, Scott & Kissane, P.A., Orlando, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So. 2d 1150, 1152 (Fla. 1979); E.S. Thomas & Assocs., Inc. v. Powell, 827 So. 2d 396, 397 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002) (“Because we are unable to conclude, based on our record, that the trial court erred . . . we affirm . . . . However, it would have been easier to assess the correctness of the trial court’s order if some explanation had been provided.”); cf. Wiggins v. Tigrent, Inc., 147 So. 3d 76, 79 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014) (discussing how the trial court’s order did not explain the basis for denial, but the hearing transcript facilitated appellate review because the trial court “made several statements that provide insight into the rationale for [its] ruling”).
CIKLIN, LEVINE and FORST, JJ., concur.
* * *
Not final until disposition of timely-filed motion for rehearing.