ARTHUR PRESTON HARRIS, III
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
When the Criminal Punishment Code's lowest permissible sentence exceeds the statutory maximum for an individual offense, the lowest permissible sentence must be imposed and becomes the maximum sentence the trial judge can impose.
[1] When the lowest permissible sentence under the Criminal Punishment Code exceeds the statutory maximum sentence for an individual offense under section 775.082, Florida St…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“when 'the statutory maximum sentence as provided in section 775.082, Florida Statutes, is exceeded by the lowest permissible sentence under the code, the lowest permissible sentence under the code becomes the maximum sentence which the trial judge can impose.'”
Court citing Butler v. State, 838 So. 2d 554, 556 (Fla. 2003) to establish the governing legal principle.
Harris was convicted of attempted sale of fentanyl and attempted sale of cocaine, both third-degree felonies punishable by up to five years in prison.…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Third-Degree Felony Sentencing cases and more on FLexlaw
FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
STATE OF FLORIDA
_____________________________
Case No. 5D2024-1179 LT Case No. 2022-305804-CFDB _____________________________
ARTHUR PRESTON HARRIS, III,
Appellant,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellee. _____________________________
On appeal from the Circuit Court for Volusia County. Richard B. Orfinger, Senior Judge.
Matthew J. Metz, Public Defender, and Judson Searcy, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.
James Uthmeier, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Allison Leigh Morris, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.
November 21, 2025
PER CURIAM.
Arthur Preston Harris, III, was convicted after trial of numerous and mostly drug-related criminal offenses. The trial court sentenced Harris to serve varying concurrent terms of imprisonment, but to be served consecutively to a thirty-five year prison sentence previously imposed on Harris in a separate case.
2 Harris’s sole challenge in this direct appeal is to the fifteenyear prison sentences imposed on him for his conviction in count three for attempted sale of fentanyl and his conviction in count four for attempted sale of cocaine. Each are third-degree felonies under sections 893.13(1)(a)1. and 777.04(4)(d)1., Florida Statutes (2022), punishable by up to five years in prison. See § 775.082(3)(e), Fla. Stat. Harris argues that his current prison sentences on these two counts are thus fundamentally erroneous. We agree, albeit for a different reason.1
Harris’s Criminal Punishment Code Scoresheet at the time of sentencing showed a lowest permissible prison sentence of 154.950 months. When the lowest permissible prison sentence under the Criminal Punishment Code exceeds the statutory cap for the individual offense, the lowest permissible prison sentence must be imposed. See State v. Gabriel, 314 So. 3d 1243, 1252 (Fla. 2021). Moreover, when “the statutory maximum sentence as provided in section 775.082, Florida Statutes, is exceeded by the lowest permissible sentence under the code, the lowest permissible sentence under the code becomes the maximum sentence which the trial judge can impose.” Butler v. State, 838 So. 2d 554, 556 (Fla. 2003).
Accordingly, under these circumstances, Harris’s fifteen-year prison sentences on counts three and four exceed that permitted by law. We vacate Harris’s sentences on these two counts and remand with directions that Harris be resentenced on counts three and four consistent with this opinion. The amended judgment and sentences on counts three and four shall also include the statutory citation to section 777.04(4)(d), Florida Statutes.
Sentences on counts three and four VACATED; REMANDED for resentencing consistent with this opinion.
MAKAR, LAMBERT, and MACIVER, JJ., concur.
Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________