DAVID HARRELL, ET AL.
v.
LAZARA MARTINEZ, ET AL.
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The trial court's decision was affirmed based on compliance with Florida Statute § 627.748(18) and Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.110(b).
[1] Florida Statute § 627.748(18) governs insurance coverage determinations and must be applied in accordance with the pleading requirements of Florida Rule of Civil Procedur…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceDavid Harrell and others appealed a decision from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County involving Lazara Martinez and others, with Lyft, Inc. appear…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed Decedmber 3, 2025. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________
No. 3D25-1167 Lower Tribunal No. 24-5258-CA-01 ________________
David Harrell, et al., Appellants,
vs.
Lazara Martinez, et al., Appellees.
An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Jose M. Rodriguez, Judge.
David Harrell, in proper person.
Rumberger, Kirk & Caldwell, P.A., and Joshua D. Lerner, Scott M. Sarason, Douglas E. Ede, and Katherine V. Becerra, for appellee, Lyft, Inc.
Before SCALES, C.J., and LOGUE and GOODEN, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See § 627.748(18), Fla. Stat. (2020); Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.110(b).