RAUDEL EDWARDS ROBINSON
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A sentence of life imprisonment does not violate Article I, Section 17 of the Florida Constitution's proscription against an indefinite term of imprisonment.
[1] A sentence of life imprisonment does not constitute an indefinite term of imprisonment in violation of Article I, Section 17 of the Florida Constitution.
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceRaudel Edwards Robinson appealed from a circuit court decision in Miami-Dade County regarding his sentence.…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Florida Rule Of Appellate Procedure 9.141(B)(2) cases and more on FLexlaw
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed December 17, 2025. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________
No. 3D25-1920 Lower Tribunal Nos. F05-5281A, F06-15941 ________________
Raudel Edwards Robinson, Appellant,
vs.
State of Florida, Appellee.
An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Carmen Cabarga, Judge.
Raudel Edwards Robinson, in proper person.
James Uthmeier, Attorney General, and Ryan Schelwat, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
Before SCALES, C.J., and EMAS and FERNANDEZ, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
2
Affirmed. See Ratliff v. State, 914 So. 2d 938, 940 (Fla. 2005) (holding that a sentence of life imprisonment does not violate the proscription in Article I, Section 17 of the Florida Constitution against an indefinite term of imprisonment); Alvarez v. State, 418 So. 3d 723 (Fla. 3d DCA 2025); Sheppard v. State, 417 So. 3d 497 (Fla. 3d DCA 2025); Sanchez v. State, 414 So. 3d 436 (Fla. 3d DCA 2025); Simmons v. State, 413 So. 3d 1003 (Fla. 3d DCA 2025); Alvarez v. State, 411 So. 3d 1260 (Fla. 3d DCA 2025); Lemon v. State, 411 So. 3d 584 (Fla. 3d DCA 2025); Padgett v. State, 411 So. 3d 528 (Fla. 3d DCA 2025); Holmes v. State, 245 So. 3d 857 (Fla. 3d DCA 2018).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Ratliff v. State, 914 So. 2d 938 (Fla. 2005)
- Holmes v. State, 245 So. 3d 857 (Fla. 3d DCA 2018)
- Sheppard v. State, 417 So. 3d 497 (Fla. 3d DCA 2025)