ANDREA RHODESHIA SMITH
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A defendant challenging a sentence as vindictive must either establish a presumption of vindictiveness through specific factors or prove actual vindictiveness, and the appellant failed to meet either burden.
[1] When no presumption of vindictiveness arises under the Wilson factors, the burden does not shift to the state, and the defendant must prove actual vindictiveness to succe…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“[F]actors that should be considered [in determining whether a presumption of vindictiveness exists] include but are not limited to: (1) whether the trial judge initiated the plea discussions with the defendant in violation of [State v. Warner]; (2) whether the trial judge, through his or her comments on the record, appears to have departed from his or her role as an impartial arbiter by either urging the defendant to accept a plea, or by implying or stating that the sentence imposed would hinge on future procedural choices, such as exercising the right to trial; (3) the disparity between the plea offer and the ultimate sentence imposed; and (4) the lack of any facts on the record that explain the reason for the increased sentence other than that the defendant exercised his or her right to a trial or hearing.”
Wilson v. State, 845 So. 2d 142, 156 (Fla. 2003), establishing the framework for analyzing vindictiveness claims.
Andrea Rhodeshia Smith appealed from a judgment in Miami-Dade County Court. The appeal involved claims regarding sentencing and alleged vindictiveness…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Right To Trial cases and more on FLexlaw
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed January 7, 2026. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________
No. 3D24-2304 Lower Tribunal Nos. AGZSNFE & AJDETFE ________________
Andrea Rhodeshia Smith, Appellant,
vs.
State of Florida, Appellee.
An Appeal from the County Court for Miami-Dade County, Marcus Bach Armas, Judge.
Law Offices of Robert S. Reiff, P.A., and Robert S. Reiff, for appellant.
James Uthmeier, Attorney General, and Lourdes B. Fernandez, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
Before EMAS, LINDSEY and GORDO, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
2
Affirmed. See Wilson v. State, 845 So. 2d 142, 156 (Fla. 2003) (“[F]actors that should be considered [in determining whether a presumption of vindictiveness exists] include but are not limited to: (1) whether the trial judge initiated the plea discussions with the defendant in violation of [State v. Warner, 762 So. 2d 507 (Fla. 2000)]; (2) whether the trial judge, through his or her comments on the record, appears to have departed from his or her role as an impartial arbiter by either urging the defendant to accept a plea, or by implying or stating that the sentence imposed would hinge on future procedural choices, such as exercising the right to trial; (3) the disparity between the plea offer and the ultimate sentence imposed; and (4) the lack of any facts on the record that explain the reason for the increased sentence other than that the defendant exercised his or her right to a trial or hearing.”) (footnote omitted); Gonzalez v. State, 419 So. 3d 1194, 1198 (Fla. 3d DCA 2025) (“[T]he presumption of vindictiveness does not arise in this case. . . . Since the presumption does not arise and the burden never shifts, [the appellant] was required to prove actual vindictiveness. [The appellant] failed to do so.”).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Wilson v. State, 845 So. 2d 142 (Fla. 2003)
- State v. Warner, 762 So. 2d 507 (Fla. 2000)