ABRAHAM JACKSON MPAKA
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A party's use of peremptory challenges is limited only by the rule that challenges may not be used to exclude members of a distinctive group such as race, and the trial court's determination of whether a proffered reason for a strike is genuine turns on credibility and is reviewed for abuse of discretion.
[1] The trial court's determination of whether a proffered reason for a peremptory challenge is genuine, turning on an assessment of credibility, is reviewed on appeal under…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“Under Florida law, a party's use of peremptory challenges is limited only by the rule that the challenges may not be used to exclude members of a 'distinctive group,' such as race.”
Statement of the governing legal standard from Craven v. State
Abraham Jackson Mpaka appealed a circuit court decision regarding the use of peremptory challenges in a trial in Miami-Dade County.…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Pretext Analysis cases and more on FLexlaw
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed January 14, 2026. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________
No. 3D23-1454 Lower Tribunal No. F08-47375 ________________
Abraham Jackson Mpaka, Appellant,
vs.
State of Florida, Appellee.
An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Robert T. Watson, Judge.
Wasson & Associates, Chartered, and Roy D. Wasson, for appellant.
James Uthmeier, Attorney General and Katryna Santa Cruz, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
Before SCALES, C.J., and EMAS and MILLER, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
2
Affirmed. See Craven v. State, 310 So. 3d 891, 899 (Fla. 2020) (“Under Florida law, a party's use of peremptory challenges is limited only by the rule that the challenges may not be used to exclude members of a ‘distinctive group,’ such as race.”) (quoting San Martin v. State, 705 So. 2d 1337, 1343 (Fla. 1997)) (additional citations omitted); Brannon v. State, 320 So. 3d 898, 902 (Fla. 3d DCA 2021) (“The factors relevant to the trial court’s genuineness inquiry include the ‘racial make-up of the venire, prior strikes exercised against the same . . . racial group, or singling out the juror for special treatment.’” (quoting Norona v. State, 137 So. 3d 1096, 1097-97 (Fla. 3d DCA 2014)); see also Melbourne v. State, 679 So. 2d 759, 764-65 (Fla. 1996) (holding that the trial court’s ultimate determination of genuineness— whether the proffered reason for the strike was a pretext—turns primarily on an assessment of credibility, therefore implicating the abuse of discretion standard, and will be affirmed on appeal unless there is no record support for the trial court's finding.).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Jeanie H. Melbourne v. State, 679 So. 2d 759 (Fla. 1996)
- Martin v. State, 705 So. 2d 1337 (Fla. 1997)
- Brannon v. State, 320 So. 3d 898 (Fla. 3d DCA 2021)
- Norona v. State, 137 So. 3d 1096 (Fla. 3d DCA 2014)