ELIZABETH NESBITT
v.
SAFEPOINT INSURANCE COMPANY

Fla. 3d DCA | 2026-01-14
No. 2024-0681
Miller, J., Fernandez, J., Logue, J., Gordo, J.
2026 FL 437 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2026)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

A trial court properly dismisses a cause of action when the plaintiff makes material misrepresentations and omissions in discovery regarding facts central to the claim.


Headnotes

[1] A trial court has a duty to dismiss a cause of action when the plaintiff makes material misrepresentations or omissions in discovery regarding facts central to the claim,…

Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Key Quotes

“plaintiff's misrepresentations and omissions about her accident and medical history in interrogatories and in deposition went to the heart of her claim and subverted the integrity of the action”

Citation to Metro. Dade Cnty. v. Martinsen, 736 So. 2d 794, 794-95 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999)

Facts & Procedural History

Elizabeth Nesbitt appealed a dismissal of her insurance claim against SafePoint Insurance Company. The trial court dismissed the case based on Nesbitt…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.

Opinion of the Court
Gordo

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Opinion filed January 14, 2026. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D24-681 Lower Tribunal No. 15-30190-CA-01 ________________

Elizabeth Nesbitt, Appellant,

vs.

SafePoint Insurance Company, Appellee.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, David Craig Miller, Judge.

Giasi Law, P.A., and Melissa A. Giasi (Tampa), for appellant.

Bickford & Chidnese, LLP, and Patrick M. Chidnese and Frieda C. Lindroth (Tampa), for appellee.

Before FERNANDEZ, LOGUE and GORDO, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Metro. Dade Cnty. v. Martinsen, 736 So. 2d 794, 794-95 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999) (concluding that “trial court abused its discretion in failing

2 to dismiss the case” where “plaintiff’s misrepresentations and omissions about her accident and medical history in interrogatories and in deposition went to the heart of her claim and subverted the integrity of the action”); Long v. Swofford, 805 So. 2d 882, 884 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001) (“A trial court has a duty and an obligation to dismiss a cause of action based upon fraud.”).


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw