ROBERTO MARTINEZ
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA

Fla. 3d DCA | 2026-01-14
No. 2025-1564
Brinkley, J., Miller, J., Lobree, J., Bokor, J.
2026 FL 470 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2026)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

A sentence of life imprisonment is sufficiently definite and constitutionally valid under Florida law.


Headnotes

[1] A sentence of life imprisonment is sufficiently definite under Florida law and does not violate constitutional requirements of definiteness.

Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Key Quotes

“the Legislature, by prescribing a sentence of life imprisonment, intends that the defendant remain in prison for the rest of his life. The term 'life' is sufficiently definite so that it can be understood and applied.”

Court's reasoning citing Ratliff v. State regarding the validity of life sentences

Facts & Procedural History

Roberto Martinez appealed from a judgment in Miami-Dade County Circuit Court imposing a life sentence.…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.

Opinion of the Court
Bokor

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Opinion filed January 14, 2026. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D25-1564 Lower Tribunal No. F86-23726B ________________

Roberto Martinez, Appellant,

vs.

State of Florida, Appellee.

An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Tanya Brinkley, Judge.

Roberto Martinez, in proper person.

James Uthmeier, Attorney General, and David Llanes, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before MILLER, LOBREE, and BOKOR, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

2

Affirmed. See Ratliff v. State, 914 So. 2d 938, 940 (Fla. 2005) (“[T]he Legislature, by prescribing a sentence of life imprisonment, intends that the defendant remain in prison for the rest of his life. The term ‘life’ is sufficiently definite so that it can be understood and applied. See State v. Wershow, 343 So. 2d 605 (Fla. 1977). There is nothing indefinite about such a sentence.”).


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw