AMERICAN COASTAL INSURANCE COMPANY
v.
VERSAILLES GARDENS I CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC.
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A trial court does not abuse its discretion by ordering an unresolved coverage determination and appraisal to proceed on a dual-track basis.
[1] A trial court does not abuse its discretion by ordering an unresolved coverage determination and appraisal to proceed on a dual-track basis in an insurance dispute.
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAmerican Coastal Insurance Company appealed a non-final order from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County regarding a dispute with Versailles Gardens…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Insurance Coverage Determination cases and more on FLexlaw
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed January 28, 2026. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________
No. 3D25-1139 Lower Tribunal No. 19-9801-CA-01 ________________
American Coastal Insurance Company, Appellant,
vs.
Versailles Gardens I Condominium Association, Inc., Appellee.
An Appeal from a non-final order from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Daryl E. Trawick, Judge.
Traub Lieberman Straus & Shrewsberry, LLP, and C. Ryan Jones, and David T. Burr (St. Petersburg), for appellant.
Kula & Associates, P.A., and Elliot B. Kula, and William D. Mueller, for appellee.
Before SCALES, C.J., and EMAS, and MILLER, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
2
Affirmed. See Heritage Prop. & Cas. Ins. Co. v. Century Park Condo. No. 2 Ass’n, Inc., 388 So. 3d 874, 875 (Fla. 3d DCA 2023) (finding no abuse of discretion in “order[ing] the unresolved coverage determination and appraisal to proceed on a dual-track basis”).