ARMANDO C. SANTANA
v.
DANY YAMILE TABORDA-CORTES, ET AL
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The trial court properly dismissed the fourth amended complaint for lack of standing and correctly denied the non-party's motion for leave to amend.
[1] A nonfinal order determining a party's entitlement to attorney's fees is not subject to appellate review and must be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceArmando C. Santana appealed the dismissal with prejudice of his fourth amended complaint and the denial of Santana Homes Corp.'s motion for leave to a…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Standing Doctrine cases and more on FLexlaw
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
FOURTH DISTRICT
ARMANDO C. SANTANA, Appellant,
v.
DANY YAMILE TABORDA-CORTES, Appellee.
No. 4D2024-2937
[January 7, 2026]
Appeal from the County Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Allison Gilman, Judge; L.T. Case No. COSO23005326.
Armando C. Santana, Miramar, pro se.
Wayne S. Kramer of Midler & Kramer, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.
SHEPHERD, J.
Appellant challenges the dismissal with prejudice of his fourth amended complaint for lack of standing and the trial court’s denial of nonparty Santana Homes Corp.’s motion for leave to amend. We affirm both rulings without discussion.
Appellant also seeks review of a nonfinal order determining Appellee’s entitlement to attorney’s fees. We dismiss that portion of the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. See Dania Beach Boat Club Condo. Ass’n, Inc. v. Forcier, 290 So. 3d 99, 102 (Fla. 4th DCA 2020).
Affirmed in part; dismissed in part.
GROSS and FORST, JJ., concur.
* * *
Not final until disposition of timely-filed motion for rehearing.