ENRICO SPENCER ROBERTS
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The trial court properly denied appellant's Rule 3.800(a) motion.
[1] A trial court's denial of a Rule 3.800(a) motion may be affirmed, and a court may warn a pro se litigant against filing abusive, repetitive, malicious, or frivolous motio…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceEnrico Spencer Roberts appealed the denial of his motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a) in two Nassau County criminal c…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Prison Disciplinary Proceedings cases and more on FLexlaw
FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
STATE OF FLORIDA
_____________________________
Case No. 5D2025-1426 LT Case Nos. 2011-CF-000856-A 2011-CF-000857-A ____________________________
ENRICO SPENCER ROBERTS,
Appellant,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellee. _____________________________
3.800 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Nassau County. Steven Michael Fahlgren, Judge.
Enrico Spencer Roberts, Crawfordville, pro se.
James Uthmeier, Attorney General, and Anne C. Conley, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
January 16, 2026
PER CURIAM.
Appellant appeals the trial court’s denial of his motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a), entered in Nassau County Circuit Court Case Nos. 2011-CF-000856-A and 2011-CF-000857-A. We affirm the trial court’s order and caution Appellant that abusive, repetitive, malicious, or frivolous filings directed to the identified case numbers may result in sanctions
2 such as a bar on pro se filing in this Court and referral to prison officials for disciplinary proceedings, which may include forfeiture of gain time. See § 944.279(1), Fla. Stat. (2025); State v. Spencer, 751 So. 2d 47 (Fla. 1999).
AFFIRMED; APPELLANT WARNED.
EDWARDS, EISNAUGLE, and BOATWRIGHT, JJ., concur.
_____________________________
Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________