NOTICE OF CORRECTION

Fla. | 2018-03-22
No. SC17-1693
Opinion Clerk
Florida Supreme Court (2018)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

A correction notice clarified that the strikethrough in former element 2 of Instruction 25.7 extends to include the word 'Defendant' in parentheses, indicating deletion of the entire line.


Facts & Procedural History

The Florida Supreme Court issued standard jury instructions in criminal cases (Report 2017-03). A formatting error in Instruction 25.7 required correc…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court

FLORIDA SUPREME COURT

NOTICE OF CORRECTION

DATE: March 22, 2018

CASE OF: IN RE: STANDARD JURY INSTRUCTIONS IN CRIMINAL

CASES - REPORT 2017-03

DOCKET NO.: SC17-1652 OPINION FILED: March 8, 2018

ATTENTION: ALL PUBLISHERS

THE FOLLOWING CORRECTION HAS BEEN MADE IN THE ABOVE

OPINION:

In Instruction 25.7, which begins on page 8, in the list of numbered elements found in the top half of page 8, former element 2, which was shown struck through except for the word “Defendant” in parentheses, is corrected to extend the strikethough line to include the word “Defendant” in parentheses. The entire former element 2 is shown struck through to indicate the deletion of the entire line.

SIGNED: OPINION CLERK

The corrected hard copy will follow.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw