DANIEL CARROLL LEVASSEUR
v.
CASSIE LYNN LEVASSEUR

Fla. 1st DCA | 2018-04-18
No. 17-1689
Griffis, Stanley H., III, J., Rowe, J., Ray, J., Makar, J.
239 So. 3d 1294 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2018) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

Absent fundamental error, the court will not address legal issues not presented to the trial court.


Headnotes

[1] Absent fundamental error, an appellate court will not address legal issues not presented to the trial court.

Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Key Quotes

“This court has consistently held that absent fundamental error, we will not address legal issues not presented to the trial court.”

Court's rationale for affirmance, citing Frost v. Frost, 227 So. 3d 227, 227 (Fla. 1st DCA 2017)

Facts & Procedural History

Daniel Carroll LeVasseur appealed a decision from the Circuit Court for Bradford County in a matter involving Cassie Lynn LeVasseur.…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.

Opinion of the Court
Makar

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D17-1689 _____________________________

DANIEL CARROLL LEVASSEUR,

Appellant,

v.

CASSIE LYNN LEVASSEUR,

Appellee. _____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Bradford County. Stanley H. Griffis, III, Judge.

April 18, 2018

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Frost v. Frost, 227 So. 3d 227, 227 (Fla. 1st DCA 2017) (“This court has consistently held that absent fundamental error, we will not address legal issues not presented to the trial court.”). ROWE, RAY, and MAKAR, JJ., concur.

2

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________

Daniel Carroll LeVasseur, pro se, Appellant.

No appearance for Appellee.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw