CHRISTOPHER LEHNING
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA

Fla. 2d DCA | 2019-02-20
No. 18-3236
266 So. 3d 840 Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (2019) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.


Facts & Procedural History

Christopher Lehning appealed a decision from the Circuit Court for Polk County. The specific factual circumstances underlying the appeal are not detai…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Polk County; Jalal A. Harb, Judge. Christopher Lehning, pro se.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Carbajal v. State, 75 So. 3d 258 (Fla. 2011); Bradley v. State, 787 So. 2d 732 (Fla. 2001); Hendrix v. State, 637 So. 2d 916 (Fla. 1994); DuBoise v. State, 520 So. 2d 260 (Fla. 1988); State v. King, 426 So. 2d 12 (Fla. 1982); Lehning v. State, 158 So. 3d 580 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014) (table decision); McDonald v. State, 133 So. 3d 530 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013); Hughes v. State, 22 So. 3d 132 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009); Coughlin v. State, 932 So. 2d 1224 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006) (en banc); Shortridge v. State, 884 So. 2d 321 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004); Brown v. State, 827 So. 2d 1054 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002); Desmond v. State, 576 So. 2d 743 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991); Budd v. State, 477 So. 2d 52 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985); McMillan v. State, 832 So. 2d 946 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002); Hart v. State, 761 So. 2d 334 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998); Kaufman v. State, 696 So. 2d 1214 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997).

KELLY, MORRIS, and SLEET, JJ., Concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • …on, and the like to felony sex offenders, as the next section explains. 1 State v. Fureman, 161 So. 3d 403, 408 (Fla. 5th DCA 2014) (applying Wilcox and holding that trial court “erred in refusing to impose sex offender probation”); Long v. State, 158 So. 3d 580 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014) (per curiam citing Wilcox); Williams v. State, 126 So. 3d 1063 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013) (per curiam citing Wilcox); Hotaling v. State, 88 So. 3d 942 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012) (per curiam citing Wilcox); Ream v. State, 843 So. 2d 309 (Fla. 5th…

Authorities Cited (15 total)

View all 15 cited authorities →

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw