ICON
v.
STATE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A defendant who has been awarded jail credit is not entitled to additional credit merely because his sentence runs concurrently with a separately imposed sentence, when he fails to allege or establish an entitlement to further credit.
[1] A defendant is not entitled to additional jail credit for time served merely because a sentence runs concurrently with a separately imposed sentence when the defendant fa…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceJerartis D. Icon was sentenced to three years in prison in Miami-Dade County and claimed his sentence ran concurrently with a prior prison sentence im…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Concurrent Sentences cases and more on FLexlaw
Jerartis D. Icon appeals the trial court’s order summarily denying his motion for additional credit time served, filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal
Procedure 3.801. Even if (as Icon asserts) the three-year prison sentence imposed in the instant case was ordered to run concurrently with a prison sentence previously and separately imposed in the circuit court for Palm Beach County,1 this would not entitle him to receive any additional credit for county jail time served in the instant case. Icon was awarded a total of 577 days of jail credit, and has failed to allege or establish an entitlement to any additional jail credit. See, e.g., Brito v. State, 194
So. 3d 522 (Fla. 3d DCA 2016); James v. State, 721 So. 2d 1265 (Fla. 3d DCA
1998); Keene v. State, 500 So. 2d 592 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986).
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Keene v. State, 500 So. 2d 592 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986)
- James v. State, 721 So. 2d 1265 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998)
- Brito v. State, 194 So. 3d 522 (Fla. 3d DCA 2016)
- Yearby v. State, 194 So. 3d 522 (Fla. 3d DCA 2016)