KYLE EUSTACE
v.
STATE

Fla. 5th DCA | 2018-04-30
No. 17-2465
Perkins, J., Cohen, C.J., Torpy, J., Wallis, J.
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (2018)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

A trial court's oral dismissal of a condition violation must be corrected in the written order when the written order states otherwise.


Headnotes

[1] A scrivener's error in a trial court's written order that contradicts the court's oral ruling may be corrected on remand to ensure the written order reflects the actual j…

Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Facts & Procedural History

Kyle Eustace appealed a trial court decision in Volusia County. The trial court orally dismissed a condition violation but the written order contradic…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.

Opinion of the Court
Affirmed And Remanded. Cohen

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

KYLE EUSTACE,

Appellant,

v. Case No. 5D17-2465

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

________________________________/

Opinion filed May 4, 2018

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Volusia County, Terence R. Perkins, Judge. Paula C. Coffman and Jeffrey D. Deen, of Office of Criminal Conflict & Civil Regional Counsel, Orlando, and Lori D. Loftis, Office of Criminal Conflict & Civil Regional Counsel, Casselberry, for Appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Kellie A. Nielan, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee. PER CURIAM. We affirm but remand for correction of a scrivener’s error. See Daniels v. State, 200 So. 3d 195, 196 (Fla. 5th DCA 2016). The trial court orally dismissed the condition 2 (9) violation but the written order states otherwise. Accordingly, we remand this cause for correction of the order. AFFIRMED AND REMANDED. COHEN, C.J., TORPY and WALLIS, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw