JOSEPH JAMAL WALKER
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Convictions and sentences are affirmed, but the written revocation order must be corrected to conform to the trial court's oral pronouncement by removing violations for failure to undergo drug and alcohol evaluation and possession of a firearm by a convicted felon.
[1] A written revocation order must conform to the trial court's oral pronouncement, and violations not established at the oral pronouncement or nolle prossed by the state mu…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceJoseph Jamal Walker appealed consolidated cases from three separate criminal matters in Palm Beach County. The trial court issued a written revocation…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Nolle Prosequi cases and more on FLexlaw
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
FOURTH DISTRICT
JOSEPH JAMAL WALKER, Appellant,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.
Nos. 4D16-3994, 4D16-4161 and 4D16-4253
[May 16, 2018]
Consolidated appeals from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Krista Marx, Judge; L.T. Case Nos. 50-2010- CF-014607B, 50-2011-CF-000626A and 50-2014-CF002429A.
Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and J. Woodson Isom, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Ilana Mitzner, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the convictions and sentences in all respects. We remand to the circuit court for correction of the written revocation order to conform to the court’s oral pronouncement. The written order contains a violation for failing to undergo a drug and alcohol evaluation; in its oral pronouncement, the court ruled that violation had not been established. The written order also contains a violation for committing the offense of possession of a firearm by a convicted felon; however, the state nolle prossed that count at sentencing after the court’s oral pronouncement.
Affirmed and remanded for correction.
WARNER, GROSS and LEVINE, JJ., concur.
* * *