ROBERT LOUIS ROBERSON
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA

Fla. 1st DCA | 2018-06-28
No. 17-1795
Wolf, J., Bilbrey, J., Kelsey, J., Cox, A.M.
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2018)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

Section 921.1401 does not violate the Sixth Amendment by requiring judicial rather than jury findings of sentencing factors, and the trial court properly resentenced appellant to life in prison.


Headnotes

[1] Section 921.1401, Florida Statutes, does not violate the Sixth Amendment by vesting in the trial judge rather than the jury the authority to find facts necessary to impos…

Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Facts & Procedural History

Roberson was resentenced to life in prison pursuant to section 921.1401 following the mandatory resentencing requirement of Graham v. Florida. He appe…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
Kelsey

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

Nos. 1D17-1795 1D17-1796 1D17-1797 (Consolidated for all purposes) _____________________________

ROBERT LOUIS ROBERSON,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee. _____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County. Angela M. Cox, Judge.

June 28, 2018

WOLF, J.

This appeal stems from a mandatory resentencing of appellant required by Graham v. Florida, 560 U.S. 48 (2010). The trial court vacated appellant’s life sentences and resentenced him to life in prison in accordance with section 921.1401, Florida Statutes. Appellant raises three issues on appeal: (I) whether the trial court erred in weighing and failing to weigh several factors before resentencing appellant to life in prison; (II) whether the trial court erred in denying appellant’s request for a jury finding under section 921.1401; and (III) whether section 921.1401 is facially unconstitutional.

2

We determine appellant failed to demonstrate that the trial court erred in considering the factors in section 921.1401 and affirm as to Issue I without further discussion. As to Issues II and III, appellant complains that section 921.1401 requires the judge, not the jury, to consider certain factors in determining whether to impose a life sentence. He contends that this statute is directly analogous to Florida’s former capital sentencing statute, which required a judge to find mitigating or aggravating factors that would warrant the death penalty. This capital punishment statute was declared unconstitutional under the Sixth Amendment because a jury, not a judge, must to find each fact necessary to impose a death sentence. Hurst v. Florida, 136 S. Ct. 616 (2016) (citing Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000)). Appellant thus argues that the trial court erred in denying his request for a jury to make findings as to the sentencing factors set forth in section 921.1401. We rejected these arguments in Copeland v. State, 240 So. 3d 58, 59 (Fla. 1st DCA 2018), for the reasons expressed in Beckman v. State, 230 So. 3d 77, 94 (Fla. 3d DCA 2017). Accordingly, the judgment and sentence are AFFIRMED. BILBREY and KELSEY, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Glen P. Gifford, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Kaitlin Weiss, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw