ERNEST BARNWELL IV
v.
JULIE L. JONES, SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS

Fla. 1st DCA | 2018-06-28
No. 18-0905
Roberts, J., Ray, J., Kelsey, J.
246 So. 3d 1290 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2018)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

A petition for writ of habeas corpus is unauthorized when it seeks to litigate issues that could have been or were raised on direct appeal or in postconviction motions.


Headnotes

[1] Habeas corpus is not an appropriate remedy for issues that could have been or were raised on direct appeal or in postconviction motions.

Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Key Quotes

“habeas corpus cannot be used to litigate issues that could have been or were raised on direct appeal or in postconviction motions”

Court's citation to Baker v. State, 878 So. 2d 1236 (Fla. 2004) in dismissing the petition

Facts & Procedural History

Ernest Barnwell IV, proceeding pro se, filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus against Julie L. Jones, Secretary of the Florida Department of Corre…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
Kelsey

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D18-0905 _____________________________

ERNEST BARNWELL IV,

Petitioner,

v.

JULIE L. JONES, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections,

Respondent. _____________________________

Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus—Original Jurisdiction.

June 28, 2018

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of habeas corpus is dismissed as unauthorized. See Baker v. State, 878 So. 2d 1236 (Fla. 2004) (habeas corpus cannot be used to litigate issues that could have been or were raised on direct appeal or in postconviction motions). ROBERTS, RAY, and KELSEY, JJ., concur.

2

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________

Ernest Barnwell IV, pro se, Petitioner.

No appearance for Respondent.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw