ROBERT WAYNE CONNELLY
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A habeas corpus petition filed by a noncapital defendant seeking collateral postconviction relief that is untimely, raises claims that could have been raised at trial or on direct appeal, or constitutes a second or successive motion under rule 3.850 must be dismissed as unauthorized.
[1] A noncapital defendant's habeas corpus petition seeking collateral postconviction relief that would be untimely as a rule 3.850 motion, raises claims that could have been…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“[F]rom now on, we will dismiss as unauthorized, habeas corpus petitions filed by noncapital defendants that seek the kind of collateral postconviction relief available through a motion filed in the sentencing court, and which (1) would be untimely if considered as a motion for postconviction relief under rule 3.850, (2) raise claims that could have been raised at trial or, if properly preserved, on direct appeal of the judgment and sentence, or (3) would be considered a second or successive motion under rule 3.850 that either fails to allege new or different grounds for relief, or alleges new or different grounds for relief that were known or should have been known at the time the first motion was filed.”
The court's statement of the Baker rule governing dismissal of unauthorized habeas corpus petitions by noncapital defendants.
Robert Wayne Connelly filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus in the First District Court of Appeal seeking collateral postconviction relief.…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Rule 3.850 Motion cases and more on FLexlaw
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
STATE OF FLORIDA
_____________________________
No. 1D18-1082 _____________________________
ROBERT WAYNE CONNELLY,
Petitioner,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA,
Respondent. _____________________________
Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus—Original Jurisdiction.
June 28, 2018
PER CURIAM.
The petition for writ of habeas corpus is dismissed as unauthorized. See Baker v. State, 878 So. 2d 1236, 1245-46 (Fla. 2004) (“[F]rom now on, we will dismiss as unauthorized, habeas corpus petitions filed by noncapital defendants that seek the kind of collateral postconviction relief available through a motion filed in the sentencing court, and which (1) would be untimely if considered as a motion for postconviction relief under rule 3.850, (2) raise claims that could have been raised at trial or, if properly preserved, on direct appeal of the judgment and sentence, or (3) would be considered a second or successive motion under rule 3.850 that either fails to allege new or different grounds for relief, or alleges new or different grounds for relief that were known or should have been known at the time the first motion was filed.”).
2
ROBERTS, RAY, and KELSEY, JJ., concur.
_____________________________
Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________
Robert Wayne Connelly, pro se, Petitioner.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.