JOSE LUIS BARAJAS, II
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The trial court properly denied appellant's rule 3.800 motion.
Jose Luis Barajas, II appealed an order denying his rule 3.800 motion in a criminal case from Indian River County.…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Motion cases and more on FLexlaw
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
FOURTH DISTRICT
JOSE LUIS BARAJAS, II, Appellant,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.
No. 4D17-2218
[July 5, 2018]
Appeal of order denying rule 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, Indian River County; Cynthia L. Cox, Judge; L.T. Case No. 2001CF000293A.
Antony P. Ryan, Regional Counsel, Donald A. Chinquina, Assistant Regional Counsel, Office of Criminal Conflict and Civil Regional Counsel, Fort Pierce, for appellant.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Don M. Rogers, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Hart v. State, 2018 WL 2049668 (Fla. 4th DCA May 2, 2018).
GERBER, C.J., and DAMOORGIAN, J., concur. MAY J., dissents with opinion.
MAY J., dissenting.
I dissent for the reasons set forth in Judge Warner’s dissent in Hart v. State, 2018 WL 2049668 (Fla. 4th DCA May 2, 2018).
* * *